Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries

Original post: click here

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Neutral

El Cartel @ Aug 17th 2007 12:37PM

I like how Engadget Tries to Cover Apples ASs. Talk about favoring a company. what ever happen to being non bias

Neutral

byaah @ Aug 17th 2007 1:10PM

Personally, I don't think Engadget is being biased in this case, they are simply pointing out the facts. The battery really is described as going through 300 cycles before its life begins to deteriorate. Its the same with almost any battery-powered electronic device.

The only difference is the cost of replacement =/

Neutral

unchi @ Aug 17th 2007 2:10PM

I don't think Engadget is covering anyone's rear, but more incensed with the amount of law suits being filed over an issue, which is known before people purchased their batteries. The key issue for this case is "if there is a class-action lawsuit, which law firm gets to be lead". There is huge money there and everyone wants free money for being 'ignorant'.

Add your comments

New Users

Name

E-mail

Current Users

E-mail:

Password

Remember Me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

replying to thread #6779274

Add your comments:

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.